Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions about the Operational Usage of the Feedback

Hacı Ömer Beydoğan

Abstract


During instruction, providing feedbacks improves students’ academic achievements as well as motivates them to actively engage in lesson activities. Feedback is very important for teaching. Feedback is a functional tool to provide active involvement of the students to the learning process because feedbacks not only affect the academic success of the student. In this study, it is important to analyze in-service mathematics teachers' opinions on feedback. This work is conceptualized as a qualitative study. The data of this study included in-service teachers’ responses to a semi-structured questionnaire, which created by the researchers. In-service teachers’ responses to the interview questions were audio taped and later transcribed verbatim to conduct a content analysis. Twelve mathematics teachers working in 12 different schools in a central district of Kırşehir voluntarily participated in the study during the 2015-2016 academic year. The data of the study were obtained conducting face-to-face interviews with the mathematics teachers. Teachers’ responses to the questionnaire items were analyzed thematically and classified under the following seven headings: style of the feedback, scope of the feedback, principles of providing the feedback, difficulties experienced when providing the feedback, reasons for providing insufficient feedback, the benefits of the feedback, and the significance of the feedback in learning. The results are presented in relation to the literature in the area. Teachers agree that it is not possible to complete these gaps with the courses offered in the collective education system Based on the findings some suggestions about the usage of feedback were provided.


Keywords


Comprehensive feedback, feedback, learning process, mathematical conceptualization, mathematical operations

Full Text:

PDF

References


KAYNAKÇA

Akyol, H. (2007). Vygotsky, Piaget ve yapılandırmacı okuma eğitimi. VI. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Eskişehir.

Black, P. and William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. AssessmentEducation, 5 (1), 7-74.

Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(1), 3–12.

Clark, K., & Dwyer, F. M. (1998). Effect of differenttypes of computer-assistedfeedbackstrategieson achievementandresponseconfidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(1), 55–63.

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation on students. Review of Educational Research, 5, 438–481.

Dempsey, J. V., Driscoll, M. P., & Litchfield, B. C. (1993). Feedback, retention, discriminationerror, and feedback study time. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(3), 303–326.

Eraz, G., & Öksüz, C. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğrencilerin ders dışı matematik etkinliklerine ilişkin uyguladıkları geribildirimlerin etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 105-119.

Erişen, Y. (1997). Öğretim elemanlarının dönüt ve düzeltme Davranışlarını yerine getirme dereceleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), 45-62.

Foote, C. J. (1999). Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(2), 155–166.

Hattie, J. ve Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112.

Kluger, A. N. ve Denisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 2(2), 254-284.

Köğce, D. ve Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Geribildirim Kavramına İlişkin İnanışları, X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 27-30 Haziran, Niğde

Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173–194.

Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. Jonassen, Handbook of research on education communications and technology: A project for the Association for Education Communications and Technology (2nd. pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Manouchehri, A. (2007). Inquiry-discourse mathematics instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 101(4), 290–300.

Manouchehri, A. & St. John, D. (2006). From classroom discussions to group discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 99(8), 544–551.

Nordstrom, C.R., Wendland, D. and Williams, K. B., 1998. “To Err is Human”: An Examination of the

Effectiveness of Error Management Training, Journal of Business and Pschology, 12, 3, 269-282.

Kahl, S. (2005, October 26). Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose! Education Week, 25(9), p. 38

Looney, J. (Ed.). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

Peker, R. (1992). Geri Bildirimin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersindeki Başarısına Etkisi. UludağÜniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 31-39.

Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A., & Harks, B. (2008). The interplay between student evaluation and instruction. Grading and feedback in mathematics classrooms. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 110–123. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.111.

Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84.

Saracaloğlu, A. S., Gencel İ.E. ve Çengel M. (2011). Öğrenci ve Öğretmen Görüşleri Açısından Lise Öğretmenlerinin Öğretme Sürecindeki Yeterlikleri, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim FakültesiEğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Aralık, 2 (2), 77-99.

Stevenson, C. E., Heiser, W. J. and Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3) 159-169.

Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 437–475.

Şahin, M., (2015). Öğrenme ve öğretme sürecinde uygulanan dönüt etkinliği ile ilgili öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin incelenmesi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 247-264.

Santagata, R., 2002. When Student Make Mistake: Socialization Practices in Italy and the United

States, Doctoral Dissertation, Los Angelels: University of California, Philosophy in Psychology.

Turkdoğan, A. Baki, A., (2012). İlköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin yanlışlara donüt

vermede kullandıkları donüt teknikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi,

cilt: 45, sayı: 2, 157-182.

Warden, C. A. (2000). EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments. Language Learning, 50 (4), 573–616.

Wigfield, A., Klauda, S. L., & Cambria, J. (2008). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.33-48). New York: Routledge

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schuck & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Yunt. P Onay Dönüt ve Düzeltme Etkenlerinin Okulda Öğrenmeye Etkisi. Yay ın-lanmamış 'Doktora Tezi. H.Ü. Ankara: 1978.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.