A Study on Developing Scale for Teacher Opinions Towards Spelling Rules

Main Article Content

Ali Türkel

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to determine Primary Education and Turkish Language teachers’ views regarding the frequency of spelling mistakes which their students make. Therefore, this experimental form made to serve this goal was presented to field specialists in terms of consultation; and each item in the form was regulated to ensure content validity rates in accordance with the feedback provided by the specialists. Items with the validity rate below 0.80 were omitted from the form. The trial form consisting of 34 items was administered to 232 Primary Education and Turkish Language teachers who teach at schools under the jurisdiction of Ministry of National Education (MoNE) via e-mail, and the gathered data were analyzed. With the help of Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA), a four-dimensioned construct with 19 items including frequently made mistakes regarding acronyms, spelling of conjunctions and suffixes, spelling of capital letters, spelling of compound words, and the spelling of the words affected by word formation processes. In the analyses, the relations between the sub-scales of the original scale were taken into consideration, revealing that factors had positive and significant relationships. In addition, it was confirmed after a series of analyses that sub-dimensions were the constituents of the general structure named spelling mistakes, which made up the upper structure. Goodness of fit indices (GFI) of the model were detected to be quite high. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) administered to the second research group justified the EFA results. The internal consistency coefficient, calculated as .91, for the entire scale was found to be quite reliable.

Article Details

How to Cite
Türkel, A. (2020). A Study on Developing Scale for Teacher Opinions Towards Spelling Rules. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 130-144. Retrieved from http://ijate.net/index.php/ijate/article/view/776
Section
IJATE_Articles

References

Akbulut, Y. (2010). SPSS applications in social sciences: frequently used statistical analyses and SPSS solutions with explanations. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Pub.
Akgül, A., & Çevik, Ç. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri [Statistical analysis techniques]. İstanbul: Emek Pub.
Aksoy, Ö. A. (1985). Yine dil yanlışları 270 sözün eleştirisi [Again language mistakes 270 criticism of the word]. Ankara: Öğretmen Pub.
Aksoy, Ö. A. (1990). Dil yanlışları [Language mistakes]. Ankara: Yalçın Emel Pub.
Aktaş, Ş., & Gündüz, O. (2003). Yazılı ve sözlü anlatım kompozisyon sanatı [Written and oral expression composition art]. Ankara: Akçağ Pub.
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. London: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Bağcı, H. (2011). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin noktalama işaretleri ile yazım kurallarını uygulayabilme düzeyi. Turkish Studies, 6(1), 693-706.
Bayat, N. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının yazılı anlatımlarında sözcük seçimi ve sözdizim yanlışları [Choice of vocabulary and syntax mistakes of novice teachers in writing]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(43), 116-144.
Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2006). SPSS for psychologists. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Pub.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E, Karadeniz Ş., Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Academy Pub.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2009). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cho, Y. (2003). Assessing writing: are we bound by only one method. Assessing Writing, 8(3), 165-191. Doi: 10.1016/S1075-2935(03)00018-7.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Multiple variable statistics, SPSS and LISREL applications for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy Pub.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
Ferguson, F., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. McGraw Hill Book Company.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
Gebrhard, R.C. (1983). Writing processes, revision and rhetorical problems: a note on three recent articles. College Composition and Communication, 34 (3), 294-296.
Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. London & New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Karagül, S. (2010). İlköğretim 6-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin Türkçe dersi öğretim programında belirtilen yazım ve noktalama kurallarını uygulayabilme düzeyi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
Kellogg, R.T. (1996). A model working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.). The science of writing: therories, methods, individual differences and applications (p.57-72). Mahwaha, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Kıbrıs, İ. (2010). Türkçe 1: yazılı anlatım. [Turkish 1: written expression]. Ankara: Kök Pub.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: from theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (1996). Assessing goodness of fit: is parsimony always desirable. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(4), 364-390.
MEB (2006). İlköğretim Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı (6-8. Sınıflar) [Primary Education Turkish Course Curriculum (Grades 6-8)]. Ankara: MEB Pub.
MEB (2009). İlköğretim Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı (1-5. Sınıflar) [Primary Education Turkish Course Curriculum (Grades 1-5)]. Ankara: MEB Pub.
MEB (2018). İlköğretim Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı (6-8. Sınıflar) [Primary Education Turkish Course Curriculum (Grades 1-5)]. Ankara: MEB Pub.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stillwell, C. D. (1989). An evaluation of goodness of tit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445.
Özdamar, K. (2016). Structural equation modelling for scale and test development. Eskişehir: Nisan Pub.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Crow’s Nest: Allen & Unwin Pub.
Seçer, İ. (2015). Process of psychological test development and adaptation: SPSS and LISREL applications. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
Şencan, H. (2005). Validity and reliability in social and behavioral measurements. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
Sümer, N. (2000). Structural equation models: basic concepts and sample applications. Turkish Psychology Articles, 3 (6), 49-74.
Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Scientific research process and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Detay Pub.
Tavşancıl, E. (2018). Measuring the attitudes and data analysis via SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Academy Pub.
TDK Türkçe Sözlük (2019). [Turkish Dictionary of Turkish Language Institution]. http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&view=gts (Access: 05.03.2019)
Türkel A., Yaman B., Aksu C. (2017). Sınıf ve Türkçe öğretmenlerinin yazım kuralları ve öğrencilerin yazım yanlışları konusundaki görüşleri. 10. Uluslararası Türkçenin Eğitimi Öğretimi Kurultayında sunulan bildiri, Okan Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Veneziano L., & Hooper J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67-70.