Main Article Content
Researchers need to know what is an appropriate sample size for interview work, but how does one decide upon an acceptable number of people to interview? This question is not relevant to case study work where one would typically interview every member of a case, or in situations where it is both desirable and feasible to interview all target population members. However, in much of qualitative and mixed-methods research and evaluation, the researcher can only reasonably interview a subset of the target population. How big or small should that subset be? This paper provides a brief explanation of why the concept of generalization is inappropriate with respect to the findings from qualitative interviewing, what wording to use in place of generalization, and how one should decide on sample size for interviews.
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Channell, A. C. (2019). Teacher and Parent Perspectives on Alignment to The Next Generation Science Standards Following Teacher Professional Development. (PhD), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 Ninth Graders' Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541 564. DOI.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098 2736(199905)36:5<541:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-1
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist, 30(2), 116-127. DOI:10.1037/h0076829
Ellis, P. D. (2010). Effect Size FAQs. Retrieved December 20, 2019 from https://effectsizefaq.com/about/
Gobo, G. (2007). Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, p. 405-426. ISBN-13: 978-0761947769.
Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: the Trees, the Forest, and the Low-Hanging Fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886-1891. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812.
Royall, R. M. (1986). The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance Tests. The American Statistician, 40(4), 313-315. DOI:10.2307/2684616
Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and The Social Sciences, 3rd Edition. Teachers College Press: Columbia University, New York. ISBN-13: 978-0807746660.
Teo, T. (2013) (Ed.). Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-94-6209-404-8.